Reply to symposiasts

Athanasios Raftopoulos

Full Text


Riferimenti bibliografici

BURGE, T. (2014). Reply to Block: Adaptation and the upper border of perception. In: «Philosophy and Phenomenological Research», vol. LXXXIX, n. 1, pp. 573-583.

LYONS, J. (2020). The cognitive impenetrability of early vision: What's the claim?. In: «Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia», vol. XI, n. 3, pp. 372-383.

LYONS, J.C. (2011). Circularity, reliability, and the cognitive penetrability of percep-tion. In: «Philosophical Studies», vol. XXI, n. 1, pp. 289-311.

MACPHERSON, F. (2012). Cognitive penetration of colour experience: Rethinking the issue in light of an indirect mechanism. In: «Philosophy and Phenomenological Research», vol. LXXXIV, n. 1, pp. 24-62.

MARCHI, F. (2017). Attention and cognitive penetrability: The epistemic consequences of attention as a form of metacognitive regulation. In: «Consciousness and Cognition», vol. XLVII, pp. 48-62.

MARCHI, F. (2020). The epistemic role of early vision: Cognitive penetration and attentional selection. In: «Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia», vol. XI, n. 3, pp. 384-395.

RAFTOPOULOS, A. (2009). Cognition and perception: How do psychology and neural sciences inform philosophy?, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

RAFTOPOULOS, A. (2010). Can nonconceptual content be stored in visual memory?. In: «Philosophical Psychology», vol. XXIII, n. 5, pp. 639-668.

RAFTOPOULOS, A. (2017). Cognitive penetration lite and nonconceptual content. In: «Erkenntnis», vol. LXXXII, n. 5, pp. 1-26.

RAFTOPOULOS, A. (2019). Cognitive penetrability and the epistemic role of perception, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

RAFTOPOULOS, A. (2020). The representational formats of cognition and perception and their interface: Part 1. In: S. DENISON, M. MACK, Y. XU, B.C. ARMSTRONG (eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd CSS conference, Cognitive Sciences Society, Toronto, pp. 3219-3225.

RENSINK, R.A. (2000). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. In: «Vision Research», vol. XL, n. 10-12, pp. 1469-1487.

RENSINK, R.A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. In: «Visual Cognition», vol. VII, n. 1-3, pp. 17-42.

SIEGEL, S. (2015). Epistemic evaluability and perceptual farce. In: J. ZEIMBEKIS, A. RAFTOPOULOS (eds.), The cognitive pene-trability of perception: New philosophical perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 405-425.

VOLTOLINI, A. (2020). Cognitive penetrability and late vision. In: «Rivista internazio-nale di Filosofia e Psicologia», vol. XI, n. 3, pp. 363-371.

WU, W. (2013). Visual spatial constancy and modularity: Does intention penetrate vision?. In: «Philosophical Studies», vol. CLXV, n. 2, 2013, pp. 647-669.

WU, W. (2017). Shaking up the mind’s ground floor: The cognitive penetration of visual attention. In: «The Journal of Philosophy», vol. CXIV, n. 1, pp. 5-32.


Copyright (c) 2020 Athanasios Raftopoulos

URLdella licenza:

Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia - ISSN: 2039-4667 (print) - E-ISSN: 2239-2629 (online)

Registrazione al Tribunale di Milano n. 634 del 26-11-2010 - Direttore Responsabile: Aurelia Delfino

Web provider Aruba spa - Loc. Palazzetto, 4 - 52011 Bibbiena (AR) - P.IVA 01573850516 - C.F. e R.I./AR 04552920482

Licenza Creative Commons
Dove non diversamente specificato, i contenuti di Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia sono distribuiti con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.