Generi psichiatrici come HPC: un nuovo approccio al dibattito discreto/continuo in psichiatria

Marco Casali


Riassunto: Questo lavoro cerca di mostrare come i disordini psichiatrici non possano essere inquadrati in chiave essenzialista, cioè non possano essere individuati attraverso proprietà necessarie e sufficienti. Preliminarmente introdurremo un modello chiamato Homestatic Property Cluster (HPC), che risulterà strumentale per comprendere, in prima istanza, la natura continua o discreta delle entità “disordini psichiatrici”. Sosterremo che i disordini mentali sono entità discrete. In seguito, per quanto riguarda la nostra critica all’essenzialismo, analizzeremo il disease model(un modello essenzialista molto utilizzato in ambito medico), ponendo l’attenzione soprattutto sui suoi limiti, cercando di mettere in rilievo varie obiezioni rispetto alla sua applicabilità. Infine, cercheremo di illustrare come il modello HPC possa essere un buon punto di partenza per identificare e classificare i generi psichiatrici e come esso possa mediare tra una visione rigidamente discreta e una visione rigidamente continua dei generi psichiatrici, poiché il modello HPC, a nostro avviso, combina in maniera virtuosa proprietà di entrambe le concezioni.

Parole chiave: Modello HPC; Generi naturali; Continuo; Discreto; Filosofia della psichiatria


Psychiatric Kinds as HPC: A new Approach to the Discrete/Continuum Controversy in Psychiatry

Abstract: This paper aims to show that psychiatric disorders cannot be defined within an essentialist perspective – i.e. by means of necessary and sufficient properties. We introduce the Homeostatic Property Cluster model (HPC) which proves useful for addressing the question as to whether psychiatric disorders are continuous or discrete entities. From this discussion we find that psychiatric kinds are discrete. We then analyze the disease model – recognized in the medical field as an essentialist model – bringing attention to its limitations and raising objections to its applicability. Finally, we argue that the HPC model offers a good starting point for identifying and classifying psychiatric kinds, and show how it can provide a bridge between the rigidly discrete and rigidly continuous perspectives on kinds, bringing together aspects of both.

Keywords: HPC Model; Natural Kinds; Continuous; Discrete; Philosophy of Psychiatry

Parole chiave

Modello HPC; Generi naturali; Continuo; Discreto; Filosofia della psichiatria

Full Text


Riferimenti bibliografici

ADRIAENS, P.R., DE BLOCK, A. (2013), Why We Essentialize Mental Disorders. In: «Journal of Medicine and Philosophy», vol. XXXVIII, n. 2, pp. 107-127.

AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (1980), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – III Edition, APA Press, Washington (DC).

AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (1994), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, IV edition, APA Press, Washington (DC).

ANDREWS, G., BRUGHA, T., THASE, M.E., DUFFY, F.F., RUCCI, P., SLADE, T. (2007), Dimensionality and the Category of Major Depressive Episode. In: «International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research», vol. XVI, Supplement 1, pp. S41-S51.

BIRD, A., TOBIN, E. (2017), Natural Kinds. In: E.N. ZALTA (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2017 Edition, URL:>

BJELLAND, I., LIE, S.A., DAHL, A.D., MYKLETUN, A., STORDAHL, E., KRAEMER, H.C. (2009), A Dimensional versus a Categorical Approach to Diagnosis: Anxiety and Depression in the HUNT 2 Study. In: «International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research», vol. XVIII, n. 2, pp. 128-137.

BORGHINI, A. (2008), La durata naturale di un genere naturale. In: «Rivista di Estetica», vol. XLVIII, n. 37, pp. 87-99.

BORSBOOM, D. (2008), Psychometric Perspectives on Diagnostic Systems. In: «Journal of Clinical Psychology», vol. LXIV, n. 9, pp. 1089-1108.

BOYD, R. (1973), Realism, Underdetermination, and a Causal Theory of Evidence. In: «Noûs», vol. VII, n. 1, pp. 1-12.

BOYD, R. (1979), Metaphor and Theory Change: What is “Metaphor” a Metaphor for?. In: A. ORTONY (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 481-532.

BOYD, R. (1988), How to be a Moral Realist. In: G. SAYRE-MCCORD (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca (NY), pp. 181-228.

BOYD, R. (1991), Realism, Anti-Foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds. In: «Philosophical Studies», vol. LXI, n. 1-2, pp. 127-148.

BOYD, R. (1999), Homeostasis, Species and Higher Taxa. In: R.A. WILSON (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), pp. 141-185.

BRIGANDT,I. (2009), Natural Kinds in Evolution and Systematics: Metaphysical and Epistemological Considerations. In: «Acta Biotheoretica», n. LVII, n. 1-2, pp. 77-97.

BROMAN-FULKS, J.J., DEACON, B.J., OLATUNJIC, B.O., BONDYD, C.L., ABRAMOWITZE, J.S., TOLINF, D.F. (2010), Categorical or Dimensional: A Reanalysis of the Anxiety Sensitivity Construct. In: «Behavior Therapy», vol. XLI, n. 2, pp. 154-171.

BROWN, T., BARLOW, D.H. (2005), Dimensional versus Categorical Classification of Mental Disorders in the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and Beyond: Comment on the Special Section. In: «Journal of Abnormal Psychology», vol. CXIV, n. 4, pp. 551-556.

CRAVER, C.F. (2009), Mechanisms and Natural Kinds. In: «Philosophical Psychology», vol. XXII, n. 5, pp. 575-594.

DEACON, B.J. (2013), The Biomedical Model of Mental Disorder: A Critical Analysis of its Validity, Utility, and Effects on Psychotherapy Research. In: «Clinical Psychology Review», vol. XXX, n. 7, pp. 846-861.

DUPRÉ, J. (1996), Promiscuous Realism: A Reply to Wilson. In: «British Journal for the Philosophy of Science», vol. XLVII, n. 3, pp. 441-444.

ELLIS, B. (2001), Scientific Essentialism,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

ELLIS, B. (2005), Physical Realism. In: «Ratio», vol. XVIII, n. 4, pp. 371-384.

ERESHEFSKY, M. (2007), Species. In: E.N. ZALTA (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2007 Edition – URL: .

ERESHEFSKY, M. (in press), Natural Kinds in Biology. In: E. CRAIG (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge, London, URL: <>.

ERESHEFSKY, M., REYDON, T.A.C. (2015), Scientific Kinds: A Critique of HPC Theory and a Proposal for an Alternative Account. In: «Philosophical Studies», vol. CLXXII, n. 4, pp. 969-986.

ESSOCK, S. (2017), When Social and Environmental Adversity Causes Schizophrenia. In: «American Journal of Psychiatry», vol. CLXXIV, n. 2, pp. 89-90.

FÀBREGA, H. (2007), The Evolution of Sickness and Healing, California University Press, Berkeley (CA).

FALK, R. (2000), The Gene: A Concept in Tension. In: P. BEURTON, R. FALK, H.-J. RHEINBERGER (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 317-348.

FALK, R. (2010), What is a Gene? – Revisited. In: «Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences», vol. XLI, n. 4, pp. 396-406.

FRANKLIN, J. (1984), The Mind-fixers, Baltimore Evening Sun - URL: .

GHISELIN, M. (1974), A Radical Solution to the Species Problem. In: «Systematic Zoology», vol. XXIII, n. 4, pp. 536-544.

GOLD, I. (2009), Reduction in Psychiatry. In: «Canadian Journal of Psychiatry», vol. LIV, n. 8, pp. 506-512.

GOLDMAN, S., DEL BOCA, K., DARKES, J. (1999), Alcohol Expectancy Theory: The Application of Cognitive Neuroscience. In: K.E. LEONARD, H.T. BLANE (eds.), Psychological Theories of Drinking and Alcoholism, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 203-246, II edition.

GRIFFITHS, P. (1999), Squaring the Circle: Natural Kinds with Historical Essences. In: R.A. WILSON (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge (MA), pp. 209-228.

GRIFFITHS, Squaring the Circle: Natural Kinds with Historical Essences, in: R.A. WILSON (ed.) Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) 1999, pp. 209-228.

HACKING, I. (1991), A Tradition of Natural Kinds. In: «Philosophical Studies», vol. LXI, n. 1-2, pp. 109-126.

HANNAN, B. (1994), Subjectivity and Reduction: An Introduction to the Mind-Body Problem, Westview Press, Boulder (CO).

HASLAM, N. (2003), Categorical versus Dimensional Models of Mental Disorder: The Taxometric Evidence, in: «Australian & New Zeland Journal of Psychiatry», vol. XXXVII, n. 6, pp. 696-704.

HASLAM, N. (2000), Psychiatric Categories as Natural Kinds: Essentialist Thinking About Mental Disorder. In: «Social Research», vol. LXVII, n. 4, pp. 1031-1058.

HAWLEY, K., BIRD, A. (2011), What Are Natural Kinds?. In: «Philosophical Perspectives», vol. XXV, n. 1, pp. 205-221.

HEALY, D. (1997), The Anti-depressant Era, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).

HELZER, J.E., KRAEMER, H.C., KRUEGER, R.F. (2006), The Feasibility and Need for Dimensional Psychiatric Diagnoses, in: «Psychological Medicine», vol. XXXVI, n. 12, pp. 1671-1680.

HULL, D. (1978), A Matter of Individuality. In: «Philosophy of Science», vol. XLV, n. 3, pp. 335-360.

INSEL, T.R. (2007), Neuroscience: Shining Light on Depression. In: «Science», vol. CCCXVII, n. 5839, pp. 757-758.

KASANIN, J. (1994), The Acute Schizoaffective Psychoses. In: «American Journal of Psychiatry», vol. CLI, n. 6, Supplement, pp. 144-154.

KENDLER, K.S. (2001), A Psychiatric Dialogue on the Mind-Body Problem. In: «American Journal of Psychiatry», vol. CLVIII, n. 7, pp. 989-1000.

KENDLER, K.S. (2005), Toward a Philosophical Structure for Psychiatry. In: «American Journal of Psychiatry», vol. CLXII, n. 3, pp. 433-440.

KENDLER, K.S. (2012), Levels of Explanation in Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders: Implications for the Development of an Etiologically Based Nosology. In: «Molecular Psychiatry», vol. XVII, n. 1, pp. 11-21.

KENDLER, K.S., ZACHAR, P., CRAVER, H.C. (2011), What Kinds of Things Are Psychiatric Disorders?, in: «Psychological Medicine», vol. XLI, n. 6, pp. 1143-1150.

KESHAVAN, S., MORRIS, W., SWEENEY, J., PEARLSON, G., THAKER, G., SEIDMAN, L., EACK, S., TAMMINGA, C. (2011), A Dimensional Approach to the Psychosis Spectrum between Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia: The Schizo-Bipolar Scale. In: «Schizophrenia Research», vol. CXXXIII, n. 1-3, pp. 250-254.

KRAEMER, H.C., NODA, A., O’HARA, R. (2004), Categorical versus Dimensional Approaches to Diagnosis: Methodological Challenges. In: «Journal of Psychiatric Research», vol. XXXVIII, n. 1, pp. 17-25.

KRAEPELIN, E. (1917), Lectures on Clinical Psychiatry, William Wood, New York, III edizione.

KRIPKE, S. (1980), Naming and Necessity, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

LEO, J., LACASSE, J.R. (2008), The Media and the Chemical Imbalance Theory of Depression. In: «Society», vol. XLV, n. 1, pp. 35-45.

LOCKE, J. (1690/1971), Saggio sull’intelletto umano, a cura di M. TAYLOR ABBAGNANO, N. ABBAGNANO, UTET, Torino.

LUHRMANN, T.M. (2000), Of Two Minds: The Growing Divide in American Psychiatry, Knopf, New York.

MAYR, E. (1996), What is a Species and What is Not?. In: «Philosophy of Science», vol. LXIII, n. 2, pp. 262-277.

MCGRATH, R.E., WALTERS, G.D. (2012), Taxometric Analysis as a General Strategy for Distinguishing Categorical From Dimensional Latent Structure. In: «Psychological Methods», vol. XVII, n. 2, pp. 284-293.

MILLER, A. (2010), Mistreating Psychology in the Decade of the Brain. In: «Perspectives on Psychological Science», vol. V, n. 6, pp. 716-743.

MINEKA, S., WATSON, D., CLARK, L. (1998), Comorbidity of Anxiety and Unipolar Mood Disorders. In: «Annual Review of Psychology», vol. XLIX, pp. 377-412.

MONCRIEFF, J. (2008), The Myth of the Chemical Cure: A Critique of Psychiatric Drug Treatment, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

MONCRIEFF, J., COHEN, D. (2006), Do Antidepressants Create or Cure Abnormal Brain States?. In: «PLoS Medicine», vol. III, n. 7, Art. Nr. e240.

MONTÉVIL, M., MOSSIO, M., POCHEVILLE, A., LONGO, G. (2016), Theoretical Principles for Biology: Variation. In: «Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology», vol. CXXII, n. 1, pp. 36-50.

MURZI, M. (2012), Specie chimiche e generi naturali. In: «L’arrivista», vol. IV, pp. 1-14.

MUTHÉN, B. (2006), Should Substance Use Disorders be Considered as Categorical or Dimensional?. In: «Addiction», vol. CI, Supplement 1, pp. 6-16.

PORTIN, P. (2002), Historical Development of the Concept of the Gene, in: «Journal of Medicine and Philosophy», vol. XXVII, n. 3, pp. 257-286.

PORTIN, P. (2014), The Birth and Development of the DNA Theory of Inheritance: Sixty Years since the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. In: «Journal of Genetics», vol. XCIII, n. 1, pp. 293-302.

PUTNAM, H. (1975), The Meaning of “Meaning”. In: «Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science», vol. VII, pp. 215-271.

QUINE, W.O.V. (1969), Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press New York.

RUSCIO, J., HASLAM, N., RUSCIO, M. (2006), Introduction to the Taxometric Method: A Practical Guide, Erlbaum, Mahwah (NJ).

SASS, H. (2007), The German Anthology of Psychiatric Texts, World Psychiatric Association, Chene-Bourg (CH).

SCHILKRAUDT, J.J. (1965), The Catecholamine Hypothesis of Affective Disorders: A Review of Supporting Evidence. In: «American Journal of Psychiatry», vol. CXXII, n. 5, pp. 509-522.

SHEAR, M., BJELLAND, I., BEESDO, K., GLOSTER, T., WITTCHEN, H. (2007), Supplementary Dimensional Assessment in Anxiety Disorders. In: «International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research», vol. XVI, S1, pp. S52-S64.

SOTO, A.M., LONGO, G., MIQUEL, P.-A., MONTEVIL, M., MOSSIO, M., PERRET, N., POCHEVILLE, A., SONNENSCHEIN, C. (2016), Toward a Theory of Organism: Three Founding Principles in Search of a Useful Integration. In: «Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology», vol. CXXII, n. 1, pp. 77-82.

STEIN, J., PHILLIPS, A., BOLTON, D., FULFORD, M., SADLER, Z., KENDLER, K.S. (2010), What is a Mental/Psychiatric Disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V. In: «Psychological Medicine», vol. XL, n. 11, pp. 1759-1765.

VAN ROSSUM, J.M. (1967), The Significance of Dopaminereceptor Blockade for the Action of Neuroleptic Drugs. In: «Archive Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Therapie», vol. CLX, n. 2, pp. 492-494.

WADE, D., HALLIGAN, P. (2004), Do Biomedical Models of Illness Make for Good Healthcare Systems?. In: «British Medical Journal», vol. CCCXXIX, n. 7479, pp. 1398-1401.

WALTERS, G.D., MCGRATH, R.E., KNIGHT, R.A. (2010), Taxometrics Polytomous Constructs, and the Comparison Curve Fit Index: A Monte Carlo Analysis. In: «Psychological Assessment», vol. XXII, n. 1, pp. 149-156.

WHITAKER, R. (2001), Mad in America: Bad Science, Bad Medicine, and the Enduring Mistreatment of the Mentally Ill, Basic Books, New York.

WHITAKER, R. (2010), Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America, Crown, New York.

WIDIGER, T.A., SAMUEL, D.B. (2005), Diagnostic Categories or Dimensions? A Question for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition. In: «Journal of Abnormal Psychology», vol. CXIV, n. 4, pp. 494-504.

WILSON, R.A., BARKER, M.J., BRIGANDT, I. (2007), When Traditional Essentialism Fails: Biological Natural Kinds. In: «Philosophical Topics», vol. XXXV, n. 1-2, pp. 189-215.

ZACHAR, P. (2000), Psychiatric Disorders Are Not Natural Kinds. In: «Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology», vol. VII, n. 3, pp. 167-182.

ZACHAR, P. (2014), Metaphysics of Psychopathology, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

ZACHAR, P., KENDLER, K.S. (2007), Psychiatric Disorders: A Conceptual Taxonomy. In: «American Journal of Psychiatry», vol. CLXIV, pp. 557-565.


Copyright (c) 2017 Marco Casali

URLdella licenza:

Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia - ISSN: 2039-4667 (print) - E-ISSN: 2239-2629 (online)

Registrazione al Tribunale di Milano n. 634 del 26-11-2010 - Direttore Responsabile: Aurelia Delfino

Web provider Aruba spa - Loc. Palazzetto, 4 - 52011 Bibbiena (AR) - P.IVA 01573850516 - C.F. e R.I./AR 04552920482

Licenza Creative Commons
Dove non diversamente specificato, i contenuti di Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia sono distribuiti con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.