Molyneux's Question: A Window on Crossmodal Interplay in Blindness

Valeria Occelli

Abstract


Abstract: In 1688, the Irish scientist William Molyneux sent a letter to the philosopher John Locke in which he asked whether a man who had been born blind and whose experience of the world was based on senses other than vision, would be able to distinguish and name a globe and a cube by sight alone, once he had been enabled to see. This issue immediately raised considerable interest amongst philosophers, who, for centuries, have continued to speculate about how this issue might be resolved. More recently, the possibility of corrective surgery for people born with congenital cataracts, has offered a valuable opportunity to explore this topic experimentally. A discussion of how Molyneux’s question has been addressed over the centuries, allows us to investigate a number of intellectual challenges, involving a variety of fields, ranging from philosophy, psychology and the cognitive sciences, to neuroscience. For instance, Molyenux’s question raises the question of whether sensory experience is specific to each sensory modality, or rather supramodal, and if a transfer of knowledge across modalities can be established. Molyneux’s question is also relevant to the discussion of whether, how and to what extent a concept of space can be developed by blind people. More generally, it concerns the idea of how conceptual knowledge is acquired and processed when vision is lacking. The present paper aims to provide an overview of all the issues raised by Molyenux’s question.

Keywords: Molyneux; Multisensory; Blindness; Nativism; Empiricism.

 

Il problema di Molyneux: una finestra sull’interazione intermodale nella cecità

Riassunto: Nel 1688 lo scienziato irlandese William Molyneux inviò una lettera al filosofo John Locke in cui chiedeva se un uomo nato cieco e la cui esperienza del mondo è basata su sensi non visivi, avrebbe potuto discriminare e nominare una sfera e un cubo semplicemente guardandoli, una volta acquistata la vista. La questione destò immediatamente grande interesse tra i filosofi, i quali per secoli avevano cercato di trovare una soluzione speculativa a questo problema. In tempi più recenti, la possibilità di sottoporre a un intervento individui nati con cataratta congenita ha offerto un’occasione propizia per indagare il tema in via sperimentale. Discutere il modo in cui il problema di Molyeux è stato affrontato nei secoli, permette di considerare un gran numero di questioni intellettuali che abbracciano campi diversi, dalla filosofia, alle neuroscienze, passando per la psicologia e le scienze cognitive. Per esempio, il problema di Molyenux investe la questione se l’esperienza sensibile sia specifica per ogni modalità sensibile o se, invece, sia supermodale, e se si possa dare un passaggio di conoscenza da una modalità all’altra. Il problema di Molyneux investe anche come e fino e che punto il concetto di spazio possa essere sviluppato da persone non vedenti. Più in generale, riguarda l’idea di come la conoscenza concettuale è acquisita e processata quando la vista manca. Questo articolo intende fornire una visione d’insieme che abbraccia i diversi temi legati al problema di Molyenux.

Parole chiave: Molyneux; Multisensorialità; Cecità; Innatismo; Empirismo.

Parole chiave


Molyneux; Multisensory; Blindness; Nativism; Empiricism.

Full Text

PDF

Riferimenti bibliografici


ABBOTT, T.K. (1904), Fresh Light on Molyneux’s Problem. Dr. Ramsay’s Case, in: «Mind», vol. XIII, n. 52, pp. 543-554.

ACKROYD, C., HUMPHREY, N.K., WARRINGTON, E.K. (1974), Lasting Effects of Early Blindness. A Case Study. In: «Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology», vol. XXVI, n. 1, pp. 114-124.

AMEDI, A., STERN, W.M., CAMPRODON, J.A., BERMPOHL, F., MERABET, L., ROTMAN, S., HEMOND, C., MEIJER, P., PASCUAL-LEONE, A. (2007), Shape Conveyed by Visual-to-auditory Sensory Substitution Activates the Lateral Occipital Complex. In: «Nature Neuroscience», vol. X, n. 6, pp. 687-689.

ARISTOTLE (1991), On the Soul, translated by R.D. HICKS, Prometheus Books, Buffalo (NY).

BACH-Y-RITA, P., TYLER, M.E., KACZMAREK, K.A. (2003), Seeing with the Brain. In: «International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction», vol. XV, n. 2, pp. 285-295.

BAILEY, S. (1842), A Review of Berkeley’s Theory of Vision, Ridgway, London.

BARASCH, M. (2001), Blindness: The History of a Mental Image in Western Thought, Routledge, London.

BEDNY, M., SAXE, R. (2012), Insights into the Origins of Knowledge from the Cognitive Neuroscience of Blindness. In: «Cognitive Neuropsychology», vol. XXIX, n. 1-2, pp. 56-84.

BERCHIELLI, L. (2002), Color, Space and Figure in Locke: An Interpretation of the Molyneux Problem. In: «Journal of the History of Philosophy», vol. XL, n. 1, pp. 47-65.

BERKELEY, G. (1709/1948-1957), An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision. In: G. BERKELEY, The Works of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne, edited by A.A. LUCE, T.E. JESSOP, Thomas Nelson & Sons, London.

BORGES, J.L. (1970), Autobiographical Notes. In: «The New Yorker», September, 19th, 1970, pp. 40-99.

BORGES, J.L. (1977/2010), Poems of the Night, translated by S.J. LEVINE, Penguin, New York.

BORGES, J.L. (1980/1984), Blindness. In: J.L. BORGES, Seven Nights, translated by E. WEINBERGER, New Directions, New York, pp. 107-121.

BRUNO, M., MANDELBAUM, E. (2010), Locke’s Answer to Molyneux’s Thought Experiment. In: «History of Philosophy Quarterly», vol. XXVII, n. 2, pp. 165-180.

BRYANT, D.J. (1997), Representing Space in Language and Perception. In: «Mind & Language», vol. XII, n. 3-4, pp. 239-264.

BRYANT, P.E., JONES, P., CLAXTON, V., PERKINS, G.M. (1972), Recognition of Shapes Across Modalities by Infants. In: «Nature», vol. CCXL, n. 5379, pp. 303-304.

CALVERT, G.A., SPENCE, C., STEIN, B.E. (eds.) (2004), The Handbook of Multisensory Processes, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

CAMPBELL, J. (2005), Molyneux’s Question and Cognitive Impenetrability. In: A. RAFTOPOULOS (ed.), Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: Attention, Strategies and Bottom-Up Constraints, Nova Science, New York, pp. 129-139.

CARRIERE, B.N., ROYAL, D.W., PERRAULT, T.J., MORRISON, S.P., VAUGHAN, W., STEIN, B.E., WALLACE, M.T. (2007), Visual Deprivation Alters the Development of Cortical Multisensory Integration. In: «Journal of Neurophysiology», vol. XCVIII, n. 5, pp. 2858-2867.

CASSIRER, E. (1932/1951), The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, edited by J.P. PETTEGROVE, F.C.A. KOELIN, Beacon Press, Boston.

CATTANEO, Z., VECCHI, T., CORNOLDI, C., MAMMARELLA, I., BONINO, D., RICCIARDI, E., PIETRINI, P. (2008), Imagery and Spatial Processes in Blindness and Visual Impairment. In: «Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews», vol. XXXII, n. 8, pp. 1346-1360.

CHAMPOUX, F., COLLIGNON, O., BACON, B.A., LEPORE, F., ZATORRE, R.J., THÉORET, H. (2011), Early- and late-onset Blindness Both Curb Audiotactile Integration on the Parchment-skin Illusory Task. In: «Psychological Science», vol. XXII, n. 1, pp. 19-25.

CHESELDEN, W. (1728), An Account of Some Observations Made by a Young Gentleman, Who Was Born Blind, or Lost His Sight so Early, That he Had no Remembrance of Ever Having Seen, and Was Couch'd Between 13 and 14 Years of Age. In: «Philosophical Transactions», n. 402, pp. 447-450.

CLASSEN, C. (1993), Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and Across Cultures, Routledge, New York.

COLLIGNON, O., CHAMPOUX, F., VOSS,P., LEPORE, F. (2011), Sensory Rehabilitation in the Plastic Brain. In: «Progress in Brain Research», vol. CXCI, n. 1, pp. 211-231.

COLLINGRIDGE, D.G. (1978), Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch. In: «Philosophy», vol. LIII, n. 203, pp. 102-105.

CONDILLAC, E. (1754/1930), Treatise on the Sensations (1754), translated by G. CARR, Favil Press, London.

COWEY, A., WEISKRANTZ, L. (1975), Demonstration of Cross-modal Matching in Rhesus Monkeys, Macaca Mulatta. In: «Neuropsychologia», vol. XIII, n. 1, pp. 117-120.

D.W. ROYAL, J. KRUEGER, M.C. FISTER, M.T. WALLACE, Adult Plasticity of Spatiotemporal Receptive Fields of Multisensory Superior Colliculus Neurons Following Early Visual Deprivation, in: «Restorative Neurology & Neuroscience», XXVIII, n. 2, 2010, pp. 259-270.

DAVENPORT, A. (2004), Aristotle and Descartes on Touch, in: «Boston College Arcadia Review», vol. IV - URL: http://www.bc.edu/publications/newarcadia/archives/2/aristotledescartes/Hamtad2011-06-07.

DAVIS, J.W. (1960), The Molyneux Problem. In: «Journal of the History of Ideas», vol. XXI, n. 3, pp. 392-408.

DEGENAAR, M., LOKHORST, G.-J. (2011), Molyneux’s Problem. In: E.N. ZALTA (ed.), «The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition)», URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/molyneux-problem.

DEGENAAR, M.J.L. (1996), Molyneux’s Problem: Three Centuries of Discussion on the Perception of Forms, translated by M.J. COLLINS, Kluwer, Boston.

DERRIDA, J. (1991/1993), Memoirs of the Blind: The Self-portrait and Other Ruins, translated by P.-A. BRAULT, M. NAAS, University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London.

DESCARTES, R. (1637/1988), Optics (1637). In: R. DESCARTES, Selected Philosophical Writings, translated by J. COTTINGHAM, R. STOOTHOFF, D. MURDOCH, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57-72.

DESCARTES, R. (1649/1988) The Passion of the Soul. In: R. DESCARTES, Selected Philosophical Writings, translated by J. COTTINGHAM, R. STOOTHOFF, D. MURDOCH, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 218-238.

DIDEROT, D. (1749/1916), Letter on the Blind for the Use of Those Who See. In: D. DIDEROT, Diderot’s Early Philosophical Works, translated by M. JOURDAIN, The Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago & London, pp. 68-141.

DORMAL, D., LEPORE, F., COLLIGNON, O. (2012), Plasticity of the Dorsal “Spatial” Stream in Visually Deprived Individuals. In: «Neural Plasticity», Article ID 687659 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/687659.

DOUCET, M.E., GUILLEMOT, J.P., LASSONDE, M., GAGNÉ, J.P., LECLERC, C., LEPORE, F. (2005), Blind Subjects Process Auditory Spectral Cues More Efficiently Than Sighted Individuals. In: «Experimental Brain Research», vol. CLX, n. 2, pp. 194-202.

DUFOUR, A., DESPRÉ, O., CANDAS, V. (2005), Enhanced Sensitivity to Echo Cues in Blind Subjects. In: «Experimental Brain Research», vol. CLXV, n. 6, pp. 515-519.

EILAN, N. (1993), Molyneux’s Question and the Idea of an External World. In: N. EILAN, R. MCCARTHY, B. BREWER (eds.). Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 236-255.

EIMER, M. (2004), Multisensory Integration: How Visual Experience Shapes Spatial Perception. In: «Current Biology», vol. XIV, n. 3, pp. R115-R117.

ELLEMBERG, D., LEWIS, T.L., MAURER, D., LUI, C.H., BRENT, H.P. (1999), Spatial and Temporal Vision in Patients Treated for Bilateral Congenital Cataracts. In: «Vision Research», vol. XXXIX, n. 20, pp. 3480-3489.

ERNST, M.O., BÜLTHOFF,M.S. (2004), Humans Integrate Visual and Haptic Information in a Statistically Optimal Fashion. In: «Nature», vol. CDXV, n. 6870, pp. 429-433.

ETTLINGER, G., WILSON, W.A. (1990), Cross-modal Performance: Behavioural Processes, Phylogenetic Considerations and Neural Mechanisms. In: «Behavioural Brain Research», vol. XL, n. 3, pp. 169-192.

EVANS, G. (1985), Molyneux’s Question. In: G. EVANS (ed.), Collected Papers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 364-399.

FALKENSTEIN, L. (2010), Étienne Bonnot de Condillac. In: E.N. ZALTA (ed.), «The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition)», 2010, URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/condillac/

FIEHLER, K., RÖSLER, F. (2010), Plasticity of Multisensory Dorsal Stream Functions: Evidence from Congenitally Blind and Sighted Adults. In: «Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience», vol. XXVIII, n. 2, pp. 193-205.

FINE, I., SMALLMAN, H.S., DOYLE, P., MACLEOD, D.I. (2002), Visual Function Before and After the Removal of Bilateral Congenital Cataracts in Adulthood. In: «Vision Research», vol. XLII, n. 2, pp. 191-210.

FINE, I., WADE, A.R., BREWER, A.A., MAY, M.G., GOODMAN, D.F., BOYNTON, G.M., WANDELL, B.A., MACLEOD, D.I. (2003), Long-term Deprivation Affects Visual Perception and Cortex. In: «Nature Neuroscience», vol. VI, n. 9, pp. 915-916.

FORTIN, M., VOSS, P., LORD, C., LASSONDE, M., PRUESSNER, S., SAINT-AMOUR, D., RAINVILLE, C., LEPORE, F. (2008), Wayfinding in the Blind: Larger Hippocampal Volume and Supranormal Spatial Navigation. In: «Brain», vol. CXXXI, Pt. 11, pp. 2995-3005.

GALLAGHER, S. (2005), How the Body Shapes the Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

GARSON, J.W. (2001), (Dis)solving the Binding Problem. In: «Philosophical Psychology», vol. XIV, n. 4, pp. 381-392.

GIBSON, J.J. (1966), The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

GLENNEY, B.R. (2012), Leibniz on Molyneux’s Question. In: «History of Philosophy Quarterly», vol. XXIX, pp. 247-264.

GLENNEY, B.R. (2012), Molyneux’s Question. In: «Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online», 2012 - URL http://www.iep.utm.edu/molyneux/

GLENNEY, B.R. (2013), Philosophical Problems, Cluster Concepts, and the Many Lives of Molyneux’s Question. In: «Biology & Philosophy», vol. XXVIII, n. 3, pp. 541-558.

GOODALE, M.A., MILNER, A.D. (1992), Separate Visual Pathways for Perception and Action. In: «Trends in Neuroscience», vol. XV, n. 1, pp. 20-25.

GORI, A., DELVIVA, M., SANDINI, G., BURR, D.C. (2008), Young Children do not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information. In: «Current Biology», vol. XVIII, n. 9, pp. 694-698.

GORI, M., SANDINI, G., MARTINOLI, C., BURR, D. (2010), Poor Haptic Orientation Discrimination in Nonsighted Children May Reflect Disruption of Cross-sensory Calibration. In: «Current Biology», vol. XX, n. 3, pp. 223-225.

GREGORY, R.L. (1967), Origin of Eyes and Brain. In: «Nature», vol. CCXIII, n. 5074, pp. 369-372.

GREGORY, R.L. (2003), Seeing After Blindness. In: «Nature Neuroscience», vol. VI, n. 9, pp. 909-910.

GREGORY, R.L. (2004), The Blind Leading the Sighted. In: «Nature», vol. CDXXX, n. 7002, p. 836.

GREGORY, R.L., WALLACE, J.G. (1963), Recovery from Early Blindness. In: «Experimental Psychology Society Monograph», vol. II, Heffers, Cambridge, pp. 65-129.

GRICE, H.P. (1962/2011), Some Remarks About the Senses. In: F. MACPHERSON (ed.) The Senses. Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Prespectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 83-100.

GROSS, C.G. (1998), Brain, Vision, Memory: Tales in the History of Neuroscience, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

HELBIG, H.B., ERNST, M.O., RICCIARDI, E., PIETRINI, P., THIELSCHER, A., MAYER, K.M., SCHULTZ, J., NOPPENEY, U. (2012), The Neural Mechanisms of Reliability Weighted Integration of Shape Information from Vision and Touch. In: «Neuroimage», vol. LX, n. 2, pp. 1063-1072.

HELD, R. (2009), Visual-haptic Mapping and the Origin of Cross-modal Identity. In: «Optometry and Vision Science», vol. LXXXVI, n. 6, pp. 595-598.

HELD, R. (2009), Visual-haptic Mapping and the Origin of Crossmodal Identity. In: «Optometry & Vision Science», vol. LXXXVI, n. 6, pp. 595-598.

HELD, R., OSTROVSKY, Y., DEGELDER, B., GANDHI, T., GANESH, S., MATHUR, U., SINHA, P. (2011), The Newly Sighted Fail to Match Seen with Felt. In: «Nature Neuroscience», vol. XIV, n. 5, pp. 551-553.

HELD, R., OSTROVSKY, Y., DEGELDER, B., SINHA, P. (2008), Revisiting the Molyneux Question. In: «Journal of Vision», vol. VIII, n. 6, p. 523.

HÖTTING, H., RÖDER, B. (2004), Hearing Cheats Touch, but less in Congenitally Blind Than in Sighted Individuals. In: «Psychological Science», vol. XV, n. 1, pp. 60-64.

HUBBARD, T.L. (1996), The Importance of a Consideration of Qualia to Imagery and Cognition. In: «Consciousness and Cognition», vol. V, n. 3, pp. 327-358.

HULL, J.M. (1990), Touching the Rock. An Experience of Blindness, SPCK, London.

HUTCHESON, F. (1727/1788), Original Letter from Dr. Francis Hutcheson to William Mace, Professor at Gresham College, 6 September 1727. In: «European Magazine and London Review», September, pp. 158-160.

JACOMUZZI, A.C., KOBAU, P., BRUNO, N. (2003), Molyneux’s Question Redux. In: «Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences», vol. II, n. 4, pp. 255-280.

JAMES, T.W., JAMES, K.H., HUMPHREY, G.K., GOODALE, M.A. (2005), Do Visual and Tactile Object Representations Share the Same Neural Substrate?. In: M.A. HELLER, S. BALLESTEROS (eds.), Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (NJ), pp. 139-155.

JÜTTE, R. (2005), A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace, translated by J. LYNN, Polity, Malden (MA).

KANAI, R., TSUCHIYA, N. (2012), Qualia. In: «Current Biology», vol. XXII, n. 10, pp. R392-R396.

KASSUBA, T., KLINGE, C., HÖLIG, C., RÖDER, B., SIEBNER, H.R. (2013), Vision Holds a Greater Share in Visuo-haptic Object Recognition Than Touch. In: «Neuroimage», vol. LXV, n. 1, pp. 59-68.

KELLOGG, W.N. (1962), Sonar System of the Blind. In: «Science», CXXXVII, n. 3528, pp. 399-404.

KENNEDY, J.M. (2006), How the Blind Draw. In: «Scientific American», vol. XVI, n. 3, pp. 44-51.

KENNEDY, J.M., MERKAS, C.E. (2000), Depictions of Motion Devised by a Blind Person. In: «Psychonomic Bullettin Reviews», vol. VII, n. 4, pp. 700-706.

KERR, N.H. (1983), The Role of Vision in “Visual Imagery” Experiments: Evidence from the Congenitally Blind. In: «Journal of Experimental Psychology: General», vol. CXII, n. 2, pp. 265-277.

KIEFER, M., PULVERMÜLLER, F. (2012), Conceptual Representations in Mind and Brain: Theoretical Developments, Current Evidence and Future Directions. In: «Cortex», vol. XLVIII, n. 7, pp. 805-825.

KLEEGE, G. (1999), Sight Unseen, Yale University Press, New Haven (CT).

KNUDSEN, E.I. (2004), Sensitive Periods in the Development of Brain and Behavior. In: «Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience», vol. XVI, n. 8, pp. 1412-1425.

LA METTRIE, J. (1745/1996), Treatise on the Soul. In: J. LA METTRIE, Machine Man and Other Writings, translated by A. THOMSON, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 41-73.

LACEY, S., SATHIAN, K. (2012), Representation of Object Form in Vision and Touch. In: M.M. MURRAY, M.T. WALLACE (eds.), The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes, CRC Press, Boca Raton (FL), pp. 179-190 - URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92850/.

LACEY, S., TAL, N., AMEDI, A., SATHIAN, S. (2009), A Putative Model of Multisensory Object Representation. In: «Brain Topography», vol. XXI, n. 3-4, pp. 269-274.

LATTA, R. (1904), Notes on a Successful Operation for Congenital Cataract in an Adult. In: «British Journal of Psychology», vol. I, n. 1, pp. 135-150.

LEIBNIZ, G.W. (1646-1716/1981), New Essays on Human Understanding, translated by P. REMNANT, J. BENNETT, Cambridge University Press, New York.

LESSARD, N., PARE, M., LEPORE, F., LASSONDE, M. (1998), Early-blind Human Subjects Localize Sound Sources Better Than Sighted Subjects. In: «Nature», vol. XXXXCV, n. 6699, pp. 278-280.

LEVIN, J. (2008), Molyneux’s Question and the Individuation of Perceptual Concepts. In: «Philosophical Studies», vol. CXXXIX, n. 1, pp. 1-28.

LEWALD, J. (2002), Opposing Effects of Head Position on Sound Localization in Blind and Sighted Human Subjects. In «European Journal of Neuroscience», vol. XV, n . 7, pp. 1219-1224.

LEWIS, T.L., MAURER, D. (2005), Multiple Sensitive Periods in Human Visual Development: Evidence from Visually Deprived Children. In: «Developmental Psychobiology», vol. XLVI, n. 3, pp. 163-183.

LEWKOWICZ, D.J. (2002), Heterogeneity and Heterochrony in the Development of Intersensory Perception. In: «Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research», vol. XIV, n. 1, pp. 41-63.

LIEVERS, M. (1992), The Molyneux Problem. In: «Journal of the History of Philosophy», vol. XXX, n. 3, pp. 399-416.

LOCKE, J. (1694/1979), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

LOCKE, J. (1708), Some Familiar Letters between Mr. Locke and several of his friends, A & J. Churchill, London.

LOOMIS, J.M., KLATZKY, R.L., LEDERMAN, S.L. (1991), Similarity of Tactual and Visual Picture Recognition with Limited Field of View. In: «Perception», vol. XX, n. 2, pp. 167-177.

LUDWIG, K. (1996), Shape Properties and Perception. In: «Philosophical Issues», vol. VII, pp. 325-350.

MANDAVILLI, A. (2006), Visual Neuroscience: Look and Learn. In: «Nature», vol. CDXLI, n. 7091, pp. 271-272.

MARTIN, M.G.F. (2011), Sight and Touch. In: F. MACPHERSON (ed.). The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 201-219.

MAY, M. (2003), The Trees were a Deeper Green Than I Imagined, and so Tall. In: «The Guardian», August, 26th, 2003 URL: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2003/aug/26/genetics.g2.

MAZZEO, M. (2005), Storia naturale della sinestesia. Dalla questione Molyneux a Jakobson, Quodlibet, Macerata.

MEIJER, P.B.L. (1992), An Experimental System for Auditory Image Representations. In: «IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering», vol. XXXIX, n. 2, pp. 112–121.

MELTZOFF, A.N. (1993), Molyneux’s Babies: Cross-modal Perception, Imitation, and the Mind of the Preverbal Infant. In: N. EILAN, R. MCCARTHY, B. BREWER (eds.), Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology, Blackwell, Cambridge (MA), pp. 219-235.

MELTZOFF, A.N., BORTON, R.W. (1979), Intermodal Matching by Human Neonates. In: «Nature», vol. CCLXXXII, n. 5737, pp. 403-404.

MERABET, L.B., PASCUAL-LEONE, A. (2010), Neural Reorganization Following Sensory Loss: The Opportunity of Change. In: «Nature Reviews. Neuroscience», vol. XI, n. 1, pp. 44-52.

MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (1945/1962), Phenomenology of Perception, translated by C. SMITH, Humanities Press, New York.

MILLAR, S. (1988), Models of Sensory Deprivation: The Nature/Nurture Dichotomy and Spatial Representation in the Blind. In: «International Journal of Behavioral Development», vol. XI, n. 1, pp. 69-87.

MILLAR, S. (1994), Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and Evidence from Studies with Blind and Sighted Children, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

MILLAR, S. (2000), Modality and Mind: Convergent Active Processing in Interrelated Networks as a Model of Development and Perception by Touch. In: M.A. HELLER (ed.), Touch, Representation, and Blindness, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 99-141.

MILLER, G. (2011), Formerly Blind Children Shed Light on a Centuries-old Puzzle, April, 10th, 2011 - URL: http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/04/formerly-blind-children-shed-lig.html;

MORGAN, M.J. (1977), Molyneux’s Question. Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

MORISHITA, H. HENSCH, T.K. (2008), Critical Period Revisited: Impact on Vision. In: «Current Opinions in Neurobiology», vol. XVIII, n. 1, pp. 101-107.

MORRONGIELLO, B.A., TIMNEY, B., HUMPHREY, G.K., ANDERSON, S., SKORY, C. (1995), Spatial Knowledge in Blind and Sighted Children. In: «Journal of Experimental Child Psychology», LIX, n. 2, pp. 211-233.

NEWCOMBE, N.S. (2002), The Nativist-Empiricist Controversy in the Context of Recent Research on Spatial and Quantitative Development. In: «Psychological Science», vol. XIII, n. 5, pp. 395-401.

NORMAN, J.F., CLAYTON, A.M., NORMAN, H.F., CRABTREE, C.R. (2008). Learning to Perceive Differences in Solid Shape Through Vision and Touch. In: «Perception», vol. XXXVII, n. 2, pp. 185-196.

OCCELLI, V., SPENCE, C., ZAMPINI, M. (2013), Auditory, Tactile, and Audiotactile Information Processing Following Visual Deprivation. In: «Psychological Bulletin», vol. CXXXIX, n. 1, pp. 189-212.

OSTROVSKY, Y., ANDALMAN, A., SINHA, P. (2006), Vision Following Extended Congenital Blindness. In: «Psychological Science», vol. XVII, n. 2, pp. 1009-1014.

OSTROVSKY, Y., MEYERS, E., GANESH, S., MATHUR, U., SINHA, P. (2009), Visual Parsing After Recovery from Blindness. In: «Psychological Science», vol. XX, n. 2, pp. 1484-1491.

PASCUAL-LEONE, A., HAMILTON, R. (2001), The Metamodal Organization of the Brain. In: «Progress in Brain Research», vol. CXXXIV, pp. 427-445.

PASQUALOTTO, A., PROULX, M.J. (2012), The Role of Visual Experience for the Neural Basis of Spatial Cognition. In: «Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews», vol. XXXVI, n. 4, pp. 1179-1187.

PATERSON, M. (2006), ‘Seeing With the Hands’: Blindness, Touch and the Enlightenment Spatial Imaginary, in: «British Journal of Visual Impairment», vol. XXIV, n. 2, pp. 52-60.

PATERSON, M. (2006), Seeing With the Hands, Touching With the Eyes: Vision, Touch and the Enlightenment Spatial Imaginary. In: «The Senses and Society», vol. I, n. 2, pp. 225-242.

PATTON, L. (2012), Hermann von Helmholtz. In: E.N. ZALTA (ed.), «The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition)», 2012 URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/hermann-helmholtz/

PAVANI, F., RÖDER, B. (2012), Crossmodal Plasticity as a Consequence of Sensory Loss: Insights from Blindness and Deafness. In: B.E. STEIN (ed.), The New Handbook of Multisensory Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), pp. 737-759.

PIAGET, J. (1952), The Origins of Intelligence in Children, International University Press, New York.

PICARD, D. (2007), Tactual, Visual, and Cross-modal Transfer of Texture in 5- and 8-year-old Children. In: «Perception», vol. XXXVI, n. 5, pp. 722-736.

PICK, H.I JR, WARREN, D.H., HAY, J.C. (1969), Sensory Conflict in Judgments of Spatial Direction. In: «Perception & Psychophysics», vol. VI, n. 4, pp. 203-205.

PLATO (2000), Timaeus, translated by D.J. ZEYL, Hackett Pub. Co., Indianapolis.

POLLOK, A. (2003), Ordinary Daylight: Portrait of an Artist Going Blind, Bantam Books, New York.

PUTZAR, L., GOERENDT, I., LANGE, K., RÖSLER, F., RÖDER, B. (2007), Early Visual Deprivation Impairs Multisensory Interactions in Humans. In: «Nature Neuroscience», vol. X, n. 10, pp. 1243-1245.

PUTZAR, L., HÖTTING, K., RÖDER, B. (2010), Early Visual Deprivation Affects the Development of Face Recognition and of Audio-visual Speech Perception. In: «Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience», vol. XXVIII, n. 2, pp. 251-257.

R.K. DAVENPORT, C.M. ROGERS, Intermodal Equivalence of Stimuli in Apes, in: «Science», vol. CLXVIII, n. 3928, 1970, pp. 279-280; S.A. ROSE, From Hand to Eye: Findings and Issues in Infant Cross-modal Transfer, in: D.J. LEWKOWICZ, R. LICKLITER (eds.), The Development of Intersensory Perception: Comparative Perspectives, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove 1994, pp. 265-284.

REICH, L., MAIDENBAUM, S., AMEDI, A. (2012), The Brain as a Flexible Task Machine: Implications for Visual Rehabilitation Using Noninvasive vs. Invasive Approaches. In: «Current Opinions in Neurology», vol. XXV, n. 1, pp. 86-95.

REID, T. (1764/2007), An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense, edited by J. BENNETT, URL: http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/reidinqu.pdf.

REVESZ, G. (1950), Psychology and Art of the Blind, Longmans Greens, London.

RÖDER, B., RÖSLER, F., SPENCE, S. (2004), Early Vision Impairs Tactile Perception in the Blind. In: «Current Biology», vol. XIV, n. 2, pp. 121-124.

RÖDER, B., TEDER-SÄLEJÄRVI, W., STERR, A., RÖSLER, F., HILLYARD, S.A., NEVILLE, H.J. (1999), Improved Auditory Spatial Tuning in Blind Humans. In: «Nature», vol. CD, n. 6740, pp. 162-166.

SACKS, O. (1993/1995), To See and Not See. In: O. SACKS, An Anthropologist on Mars: Seven Paradoxical Tales, Knopf, New York, pp. 108-152.

SACKS, O. (1993), To See and Not See. A Neurologist’s Notebook. In: «The New Yorker», May 10, 1993, pp. 59-73.

SACKS, O. (2003), The Mind’s Eye. A Neurologist’s Notebook. In: «The New Yorker», July, 28th, 2003, pp. 48-59.

SANN, C., STRERI, A. (2007), Perception of Object Shape and Texture in Human Newborns: Evidence from Cross-modal Transfer Tasks. In: «Developmental Science», vol. X, n. 3, pp. 399-410.

SARAMAGO, J. (1998), Blindness, translated by G. PONTIERO, Harcourt Brace & Company, New York.

SASSEN, B. (2004), Kant on Molyneux’s Problem. In: «British Journal for the History of Philosophy», vol. XII, n. 3, pp. 471-485.

SCHUMACHER, R. (2003), What are the Direct Objects of Sight? Locke on the Molyneux Question. In: «Locke Studies», vol. III, pp. 41-61.

SINHA, P., HELD, R. (2012), Sight Restoration. In: «F1000 Medicine Reports», vol. IV, p. 17.

SMITH, A.D. (2000), Space and Sight. In: «Mind», CIX, n. 435, pp. 481-518.

SPELKE, E.S. (1998), Nativism, Empiricism, and the Origins of Knowledge. In: «Infant Behavior and Development», vol. XXI, n. 2, pp. 181-200.

SPELKE, E.S., NEWPORT, E.L. (1998), Nativism, Empiricism, and the Development of Knowledge. In: W. DAMON, R.M. LERNER (eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. I, Theoretical Models of Human Development, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 275-340.

SPENCER, J.P., BLUMBERG, M.S., MCMURRAY, B., ROBINSON, S.R., SAMUELSON, L.K., TOMBLIN, J.B. (2009), Short Arms and Talking Eggs: Why we Should no longer Abide the Nativist-Empiricist Debate. In: «Child Development Perspectives», vol. III, n. 2, pp. 79-87.

SPOLIDORO, M., SALE, A., BERARDI, N., MAFFEI, L. (2009), Plasticity in the Adult Brain: Lessons from the Visual System. In: «Experimental Brain Research», vol. CXCII, n. 3, pp. 335-341.

STEIN, B.E. (ed.) (2012), The New Handbook of Multisensory Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

STRERI, A. (1987), Tactile Discrimination of Shape and Intermodal Transfer in 2- to 3-month-old Infants. In: «British Journal of Developmental Psychology», vol. V, n . 3, pp. 213-220.

STRERI, A., GENTAZ, E. (2003), Cross-modal Recognition of Shape from Hand to Eyes in Human Newborns. In: «Somatosensory & Motor Research», vol. XX, n. 1, pp. 11-16.

STRERI, A., GENTAZ, E. (2004), Cross-modal Recognition of Shape from Hand to Eyes and Handedness in Human Newborns. In: «Neuropsychologia», vol. XLII, n. 10, pp. 1365-1369.

SZUCS, D., CSÉPE, V. (2005), The Parietal Distance Effect Appears in Both the Congenitally Blind and Matched Sighted Controls in an Acoustic Number Comparison Task. In: «Neuroscience Letters», vol. CCCLXXXIV, n. 1-2, pp. 11-16.

THALER, L., ARNOTT, S.R., GOODALE, M.A. (2011), Neural Correlates of Natural Human Echolocation in Early and Late Blind Echolocation Experts. In: «PLoS One», vol. VI, p.e20162.

THEUREL, A., FRILEUX, S., HATWELL, Y., GENTAZ, E. (2012), The Haptic Recognition of Geometrical Shapes in Congenitally Blind and Blindfolded Adolescents: Is There a Haptic Prototype Effect?. In: «PLoS One», vol. VII, p. e40251.

THINUS-BLANC, C., GAUNET, F. (1997), Representation of Space in Blind Persons: Vision as a Spatial Sense?. In: «Psychological Bulletin», vol. CXXI, n. 1, pp. 20-42.

TINTI, C., ADENZATO, M., TAMIETTO, M., CORNOLDI, C. (2006), Visual Experience is not Necessary for Efficient Survey Spatial Cognition: Evidence from Blindness. In: «Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology», LIX, n. 7, pp. 1306-1328.

TUNSTALL, K.E. (2008), The Judgement of Experience: Seeing and Reading in Diderot’s Lettre sur les aveugles . In: «French Studies», XLII, n. 4, pp. 404-416.

UNGAR, S. (2000), Cognitive Mapping Without Visual Experience. In: R. KITCHIN, S. FREUNDSCHUH (eds.), Cognitive Mapping: Past Present and Future, Routledge, London, pp. 221-248.

VALVO, A. (1971), Sight Restoration After Long-term Blindness: The Problems and Behavior Patterns of Visual Rehabilitation, American Foundation for the Blind, New York.

VAN CLEVE, J. (2007), Reid’s Answer to Molyneux’s Question. In: «The Monist», vol. XC, n. 2, pp. 251-270.

VAN DER BERG, S. (2009), Full Sight, Fancied Sight, and Touch. In: «Ben Jonson Journal», 16, 2009, pp. 16-32.

VOLTAIRE (1738/1967), The Elements of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy, translated by J. HANNA, Frank Cass, London.

VON HERDER, J.G. (1772/2002), Treatise on the Origin of Language. In: J.G. VON HERDER, Philosophical Writings, translated by M.N. FORSTER, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 65-166.

VON SENDEN, M. (1960), Space and Sight: The Perception of Space and Shape in the Congenitally Blind Before and After Operation, translated by P. HEATH, Methuen & Co, London.

WALLACE, M.T., PERRAULT, T.J., HAIRSTON, W.D, STEIN, B.E. (2004), Visual Experience is Necessary for the Development of Multisensory Integration. In: «The Journal of Neuroscience», vol. XXIV, n. 43, pp. 9580-9584.

WALLACE, M.T., STEIN, B.E. (2007), Early Experience Determines How the Senses Will Interact. In: «Journal of Neurophysiology», vol. XCVII, n. 1, pp. 921-926.

WANDELL, B.A. (1995), Seeing. In: B.A. WANDELL, Foundations of Vision, Sinauer, Sunderland (MA), pp. 387-404.

WELCH, R.B., WARREN, D.H. (1980), Immediate Perceptual Response to Inter-sensory Discrepancy. In: «Psychological Bulletin», vol. LXXXVIII, n. 3, pp. 638-667.

WIESEL, T.N., HUBEL, D.H. (1963), Effects of Visual Deprivation on Morphology and Physiology of Cells in the Cats Lateral Geniculate Body. In: «Journal of Neurophysiology», vol. XXVI, pp. 978-993.

WISMEIJER, D.A., GEGENFURTNER, K.R., DREWING, K. (2012), Learning from Vision-to-touch is Different Than Learning from Touch-to-vision. In: «Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience», vol. VI, article 105, doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00105.

WOLFE, C.T. (2012), Early Modern Epistemologies of the Senses: From the Nobility of Sight to the Materialism of Touch, 2012 – URL: http://sydney.edu.au/science/hps/early_modern_science/publications_and_preprints/Wolfe_Early_modern_epistemologies.pdf

YAU, J.M., PASUPATHY, A., FITZGERALD, P.J., HSIAO, S.S., CONNOR, C.E. (2009), Analogous Intermediate Shape Coding in Vision and Touch. In: «Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America», vol. CVI, pp. 16457-16462.

ZEKI, S., AGLIOTI, S., MCKEEFRY, D., BERLUCCHI, G. (1999), The Neurological Basis of Conscious Color Perception in a Blind Patient. In: «Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America», vol. XCVI, pp. 14124-14129.

ZIAT, M., HAYWARD, V., CHAPMAN, C.E., ERNST, M.O., LENAY, C. (2010), Tactile Suppression of Displacement. In: «Experimental Brain Research», vol. CCVI, n. 3, pp. 299-310.

ZIMLER, J., KEENAN, J.M. (1983), Imagery in the Congenitally Blind: How Visual are Visual Images?. In: «Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition», vol. IX, n. 2, pp. 269-282.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.4453/rifp.2014.0006

Copyright (c) 2014 Valeria Occelli

URLdella licenza: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia - ISSN: 2039-4667 (print) - E-ISSN: 2239-2629 (online)

Registrazione al Tribunale di Milano n. 634 del 26-11-2010 - Direttore Responsabile: Aurelia Delfino

Web provider Aruba spa - Loc. Palazzetto, 4 - 52011 Bibbiena (AR) - P.IVA 01573850516 - C.F. e R.I./AR 04552920482

Licenza Creative Commons
Dove non diversamente specificato, i contenuti di Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia sono distribuiti con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.